Email remains one of the most effective entry points for phishing, fraud and impersonation. Yet the real challenge is not just spotting that an email looks suspicious, but having a clear environment to understand why, assess its impact and communicate it quickly. Email Sandbox was built to solve exactly that part.
Why we launched Email Sandbox
Security and fraud teams receive more and more messages to review, yet they do not always have a practical tool to analyze them without leaving their working environment. We wanted to provide a more useful experience: upload the message, review the real technical signals and move from triage to reporting without changing context.
What the new module does
Email Sandbox lets teams upload suspicious .eml or .msg emails and analyze sender identity, authentication, received hops, URLs, attachments and the final verdict in a structured way.
- Analysis of SPF, DKIM and DMARC to understand message authentication posture.
- Extraction of real URLs, including unwrapping protected links such as SafeLinks.
- Review of attachments with safe analysis and clear evidence for the analyst.
- Analyst summaries and AI-assisted drafts for clients or operational communication.
What analysts see in practice
The module is designed so that review does not stop at a simple “malicious / not malicious” label. The goal is for teams to understand what was detected, why the message is relevant and how to explain it quickly.
- Clearer sender identity, Reply-To and Return-Path visibility
- Extracted URL, analyzed URL and final URL visibility to avoid confusion
- Attachments with expandable details and useful triage context
- Final verdict and score combining content, authentication, URLs, domains and attachments
Why it matters
Email Sandbox is not just a new module; it is a more structured way to work with one of the most common entry points for fraud and impersonation. It helps reduce analysis time, improve triage quality and accelerate communication with clients, internal teams or external parties.